Current Legislation

State Senator Lydia Edwards is committed to delivering real results for the people of Massachusetts. This page offers a transparent look at every bill she has filed this legislative session—what each bill does, why it matters, and where it currently stands in the legislative process.

Use the visual guide below to better understand each stage a bill must go through—from initial filing to becoming law. As bills move through committee hearings, chamber votes, and ultimately to the Governor’s desk, we’ll keep this page updated so you can follow their progress every step of the way.

Explore the list below to see Senator Edwards’ active legislation and where each bill stands in the process.

An Act to Facilitate Labor Peace Among the Cannabis Workforce

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 77) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to facilitate labor peace among the cannabis workforce. Cannabis Policy.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Cannabis Policy)

Bill Summary:

This bill adds new labor protections for workers in the cannabis industry in Massachusetts. It requires marijuana businesses to allow union representatives to talk with employees about their rights and forming a union, without interference from the employer. To meet this requirement, businesses can either submit a statement saying they won’t interfere or enter into a formal “labor peace agreement” with a union.

The bill also requires these protections to be reaffirmed when a business renews its license. Additionally, the Cannabis Control Commission must keep an updated list of legitimate labor organizations and create regulations to implement these changes. Small cannabis businesses are exempt from these new labor requirements.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Eliminating Forced Broker's Fees

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 224) of Lydia Edwards, William N. Brownsberger, Cindy F. Friedman and Mike Connolly for legislation to eliminate forced real estate broker's fees. Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure)

Bill Summary:

This bill would make it illegal for real estate brokers or agents working for landlords to charge tenants or prospective tenants any fees—such as for listing, showing, or paperwork—when renting a residential property in Massachusetts.

It also bans landlords from requiring tenants to hire a broker and pay a fee in order to apply for or lease a unit. Violating these rules would be considered an unfair or deceptive business practice and could result in a fine of up to $1,000 per violation. The law would take effect immediately upon passage.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act to Eliminate "grab-and-go" Counters at Large Events

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 225) of Lydia Edwards and John F. Keenan for legislation to eliminate "grab-and-go" alcohol sales at large events. Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure)

Bill Summary:

This bill adds new rules for selling alcohol at large entertainment venues in Massachusetts—defined as places designed for live sports or shows with more than 4,900 people.

It states that alcohol can only be sold at these venues if the sale is handled directly by an employee of a licensed vendor approved by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission. Patrons cannot access alcohol until it has been officially sold and personally served to them by that employee.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Protecting Black Girls from Targeted Toxicity

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 226) of Lydia Edwards relative to the promotion, display or advertising of cosmetic products that contain harmful ingredients. Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Consumer Protection and Professional Licensure)

Bill Summary:

This bill bans advertisements aimed at children under 18 for cosmetic products that contain harmful chemicals—such as mercury, parabens, phthalates, or talc powder. It also prohibits using a child’s image, voice, or likeness to promote these products.

Violators face a fine of at least $5,000 for a first offense and $10,000 or more for repeated violations. The Attorney General can take legal action to stop violations and seek penalties, and individuals harmed by these ads can also sue for damages. The law would take effect 90 days after it is passed.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Providing in-district Transportation Funding

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 348) of Lydia Edwards, Angelo J. Puppolo, Jr., Vanna Howard, Michael D. Brady and other members of the General Court for legislation to provide in-district transportation funding for students. Education.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Education)

Bill Summary:

This bill requires the state to reimburse school districts for the transportation costs of students in special education programs when that transportation is required by their Individualized Education Plan (IEP) and not typically provided to general education students.

Reimbursement will cover both the average cost of transporting general education students and any additional special education transportation costs—up to 110% of the statewide average for those extra costs.

The bill phases in full funding over four years:

25% reimbursement in FY2026
50% in FY2027
75% in FY2028
100% in FY2029 and beyond

This phased approach applies both to the new special education reimbursement provision and to existing transportation reimbursements under another section of law.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Regulating Certain Mortgages

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 731) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to regulate shared appreciation mortgage loans. Financial Services.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Financial Services)

Bill Summary:

This bill allows shared appreciation mortgages in Massachusetts—loans where lenders get a share of a home’s increased value when it’s sold or refinanced.

Key points:

Only allowed under approved programs and for owner-occupied homes (up to 4 units).
Lender’s share is capped at 15% of appreciation.
Borrowers keep rights to refinance and are protected from forced arbitration, early payoff penalties, and loss of housing for heirs.
Mandatory HUD-certified counseling is required, paid for by the lender.
Borrowers must get advance notice of loan terms and repayment.
Extra protections apply in foreclosure-related deals.
Violations void the loan and may trigger fines, damages, and license revocation.

Bottom line: The bill enables these mortgages while ensuring strong consumer protections.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Increasing Access to Universal Dental Care

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 732) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to increase access to universal dental care for all residents of the commonwealth regardless of immigration status. Financial Services.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Financial Services)

Bill Summary:

This bill creates a new Commonwealth Dental Access Program to offer stand-alone dental insurance to Massachusetts residents who aren’t eligible for coverage through the state health insurance exchange.

The program will be run separately from the existing Health Connector, and personal information from participants will be kept private and not treated as a public record. The Health Connector will issue regulations to carry out the program.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Providing a Delivery Network Company Surcharge for Small Businesses and EJ Communities

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 733) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to provide a delivery network company surcharge for small businesses and EJ communities. Financial Services.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Financial Services)

Bill Summary:

This bill regulates delivery network companies (like app-based delivery services) in Massachusetts and sets up new fees to support public programs.

Key points:

Defines Delivery Network Companies as businesses that use digital platforms to assign couriers for deliveries.
Creates a new division within the Department of Public Utilities to oversee these companies and enforce rules.
Requires companies to report annual delivery numbers and pay a per-delivery fee:
- $0.20 for food
- $0.50 for goods
- $1.40 for alcohol and marijuana
- Exemptions: deliveries involving equity programs, prescriptions, or medical devices
The money collected goes to a Transit Authority Fund, which will be split:
- 50% for grants to small businesses in underserved communities, including those hiring veterans or formerly incarcerated individuals.
- 50% for the MBTA, with at least 10% of that going to support free or low-cost transit services, especially on the waterfront or for low-income riders.

Bottom line: The bill adds modest delivery fees to fund small business support and improve public transportation access.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act to Ensure Uniform and Transparent Reporting of Medical Debt Data

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 857) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to ensure uniform and transparent reporting of medical debt data. Health Care Financing.

CURRENT STATUS: Reading & Review (Senate)

Bill Summary:

This bill creates a uniform medical debt reporting system in Massachusetts to increase transparency, protect patients, and guide policy.

Key points:

Defines "medical debt" and "significant medical debt" (over $200).
Before a provider can send medical debt to collections, they must report it through a new electronic system managed by the state.
The system will collect demographic data (e.g., race, income, disability status, insurance coverage) to analyze the impact of medical debt across different groups.
Data will be shared with state agencies and may be made public through an online portal.
Medical debt can’t appear on credit reports if it:
- Hasn’t been reported through the new system,
- Is paid or settled, or
- Is less than one year old.
The state’s Health Policy Commission will fund the system through its existing payment reform resources.

Bottom line: The bill aims to track, regulate, and reduce the negative effects of medical debt, especially for vulnerable populations.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Relative to the Condominium Owners’ Rights

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 980) of Lydia Edwards and Robyn K. Kennedy for legislation relative to the Condominium Owners’ Rights Act (CORA). Housing.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Housing)

Bill Summary:

This bill updates Massachusetts condominium law to improve transparency, fairness, and participation for unit owners.

Key highlights:

Faster access to records: Condo boards must provide requested records within 5–10 business days, electronically and at no cost. Fines apply if they don't comply.
Expanded record access: Owners can view most documents, including engineering reports; legal records may be released after litigation ends unless protected by attorney-client privilege.
Reserve fund & maintenance planning: Condos must contribute at least 10% of their annual budget to a reserve fund and update maintenance plans every two years. Large condos (50+ units) must have professional reserve studies every 10 years.
Dispute resolution: Condos must have an internal dispute process. An owner must get a written board response within 7 days.
Meeting rules: Boards must meet quarterly (or monthly for larger condos or managed buildings) and allow open attendance with time for owner comments. Minutes must be detailed and available to owners.
Remote meetings & voting: Boards and owners can participate in meetings and vote electronically using secure, encrypted platforms (e.g., Zoom, Webex).
Condo Ombudsman Office: Creates a new state office to handle owner complaints, offer mediation, track trends, and educate boards and residents.

Bottom line: This bill ensures condo owners have better access to records, meetings, and fair dispute resolution—while requiring professional planning and oversight for building upkeep.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Establishing Housing Training Program for Elected Members of Municipal Boards

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 981) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to establish housing training program for elected members of municipal boards.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Housing)

Bill Summary:

This bill requires mandatory training for all elected or appointed members of local boards or commissions involved in land use decisions (such as zoning or planning).

Key points:

The Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities will create the training program with input from planning and housing organizations.
Training will cover zoning laws, fair housing, and other relevant topics.
Board members must complete the training:
- Within 6 months of starting their term, and
- Every 4 years thereafter.
Members who fail to complete the training on time will be removed, and their seat will be filled through the normal appointment or election process.

Bottom line: The bill ensures that local land use decision-makers are properly trained in zoning and fair housing laws to support informed and equitable governance.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act to Plan, Preserve, and Protect

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 982) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to create the Anti -Displacement Pilot Program. Housing.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Housing)

Bill Summary:

This bill creates a Tenant’s Opportunity to Purchase Pilot Program to help renters in areas at high risk of displacement.

Key points:

Cities and towns can apply to join the program, which will be limited to 15 zip codes.
Eligible areas must have:
- At least 70% rental housing
- High rates of evictions or emergency rental assistance applications
- High poverty levels
The Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities will create rules with community input by December 31, 2025, and begin accepting applications by June 30, 2026.
The pilot will run for 5 years, ending with a public report that may recommend continuing, expanding, or ending the program.

Bottom line: The bill launches a targeted pilot program to help renters in vulnerable communities buy their homes and prevent displacement.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Protecting Employee Free Speech

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1078) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to protect employee free speech.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Judiciary)

Bill Summary:

This bill protects employees in Massachusetts from being forced to attend or listen to employer-sponsored meetings about political or religious matters.

Key points:

Defines "political matters" (e.g., elections, legislation, unions) and "religious matters" (e.g., beliefs, practices).
Employers cannot discipline or fire employees for:
- Exercising their First Amendment rights (as long as it doesn’t interfere with work), or
- Refusing to attend meetings or communications where the main purpose is to share the employer’s political or religious views.
Employees can sue for damages, including lost wages, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees, if they are punished for refusing to participate.

Exceptions:

Employers can still share legally required or job-related information.
Casual conversations are allowed if not mandatory.
Higher education institutions can continue academic discussions.
Religious organizations are exempt when speaking to employees about religious matters related to their mission.

Bottom line: The bill protects workers from being pressured or punished by their employers for not engaging in political or religious discussions at work.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Providing for the Allowance of Early Evidence Kits

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1079) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to provide for the allowance of early evidence kits in sexual assaults. The Judiciary.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Judiciary)

Bill Summary:

This bill updates and strengthens Massachusetts laws around the collection, storage, testing, and tracking of sexual assault evidence kits, including new provisions for early evidence collection.

Key points:

Defines key terms like sexual assault evidence kits and early evidence kits (used when a traditional exam isn’t accessible).
Kits must be preserved for at least 15 years, and victims must be informed in writing about this timeline.
Early evidence kits can be collected and stored temporarily when traditional exams aren't possible but must be clearly labeled and may be analyzed under specific conditions.
Testing deadlines: Labs must test kits within 30 days of receiving them. Self-administered kits may be accepted in smaller municipalities.
Victims have the right to:
- Receive contact info and updates about the status of their kit.
- Get written information about their rights and the laws related to kit testing and preservation.
- Request additional retention of their kit beyond standard timelines.
DNA profiles resulting from testing will be submitted to state and national databases (e.g., CODIS).
All kits must be entered into a statewide tracking system.
Clarifies when early evidence kits may or may not be submitted for analysis (e.g., lack of consent, insufficient legal basis).
Victims retain the right to remain anonymous and can choose to file a criminal complaint later.

Bottom line: The bill improves victim protections, ensures evidence is properly preserved and tested in a timely way, and sets clear rules for handling early and traditional sexual assault evidence kits.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act for the Removal of Void Restrictive Covenants

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1080) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to allow parties discriminated against to bring a case against covenants that restrict the use of land. The Judiciary.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Judiciary)

Bill Summary:

This bill strengthens efforts to identify and remove racially discriminatory restrictions—such as racial covenants—from Massachusetts land records and titles.

Key points:

Registry of Deeds review: When issuing a new land title, registries must check for illegal restrictions (like racial covenants) that violate Section 23B of Chapter 184.
Automatic removal: If the restriction is clearly and solely illegal, registries can remove the language without a court order and include a public note acknowledging the discriminatory history.
Court process for unclear cases: If the restriction is mixed with valid terms or unclear, registries must petition the Land Court for permission to amend the record.
Public reporting: Each registry must report annually on how many titles were amended to remove such restrictions.
Landowners' rights: Property owners (or others with interest) can file free court petitions to remove racially discriminatory language from property documents.
Court authority: The Land Court can issue orders to amend titles and officially declare the land free of discriminatory covenants, binding on all parties.

Bottom line: The bill creates a clear process for removing illegal racial restrictions from property records and ensures the Commonwealth takes an active role in acknowledging and correcting the legacy of housing discrimination.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act to Correct Non-Fault Unemployment Insurance Overpayments

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1302) of Lydia Edwards for legislation relative to non-fault unemployment insurance overpayments.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Labor and Workforce Development)

Bill Summary:

This bill reforms how Massachusetts handles unemployment benefit overpayments, especially for people who were not at fault for being overpaid.

Key changes:

Time limits on recovery:

The state can only try to recover overpaid unemployment benefits:
- Within 6 years if the individual was at fault.
- Within 3 years if the person was not at fault—and only up to 10% per week can be deducted from future benefits.

Debt forgiveness:

If the overpaid person was not at fault, their debt will be automatically canceled after 3 years.
Debt may also be canceled if the person is deceased with no estate or cannot be located after 5 years.

Waivers for non-fault overpayments:

The Department of Unemployment Assistance (DUA) must waive repayment if:
- The person is low-income or receiving public assistance (e.g., SNAP, SSI, TAFDC, etc.)
- The error was due to DUA delays or system errors (e.g., during the COVID-19 pandemic)
- Collecting the money back would be unfair or cause hardship
Claimants can apply for a waiver at any time, even during an appeal.
DUA must provide clear notice in the person’s primary language and offer in-person and phone support.
No collections can happen while a waiver request is pending.

Limits on aggressive collections:

DUA can only intercept state or federal tax refunds if the individual was at fault and the decision is final.
If DUA waives the overpayment after collecting money, the person must be refunded.

Bottom line: This bill protects people who were unintentionally overpaid unemployment benefits by setting strict time limits, offering waivers and automatic forgiveness, and limiting harsh collection practices unless the person was truly at fault.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Providing Opportunities for Apprentices to Complete their Training and Ensuring for a Skilled Workforce in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1303) of Lydia Edwards, Paul W. Mark and Vanna Howard for legislation to provide opportunities for apprentices to complete their training and ensuring for a skilled workforce in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Labor and Workforce Development.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Labor and Workforce Development)

Bill Summary:

This bill requires large public construction projects in Massachusetts (over $1 million) to include a minimum percentage of apprentice labor to support workforce development and trade training.

Key points:

For any project over $1 million, a portion of the work hours must be performed by apprentices enrolled in approved training programs, following legal apprentice-to-journeyworker ratios.
This rule applies to employees of both contractors and subcontractors who are paid the prevailing wage and work directly on the job site.

Phase-in schedule:

6 months after the bill becomes law: 5% of work hours must be by apprentices.
1 year after passage: 10%
2 years after passage: 15%

Where it applies: This requirement is added to the following laws:

Chapter 149 (Section 26) – governing public construction labor standards
Chapter 149A (Section 6) – covering public construction methods (like CM-at-Risk)
Chapter 30 (Section 39m) – concerning public works bidding laws

Bottom line: The bill ensures that large public projects help train the next generation of skilled workers by requiring a growing share of work to be done by apprentices in state-approved programs.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Promoting Infant Friendly Workplaces

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1304) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to promote infant friendly workplaces by allowing guardians to bring infants aged six weeks to six months to the workplace.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Labor and Workforce Development)

Bill Summary:

This bill creates a new Infant-Friendly Workplace Program in Massachusetts to help working parents bring their infants (ages 6 weeks to 6 months) to work in a safe, supportive environment.

Key points:

Voluntary program: Employers can choose to participate and apply for designation as an Infant-Friendly Workplace.
Eligibility: Parents returning to work after Paid Family and Medical Leave for childbirth, adoption, or fostering are eligible to participate.
Funding support: Employers can receive grants and tax incentives to set up infant-friendly spaces, including safe areas for infants and private spaces for breastfeeding. Funds cannot be used for construction, land purchases, or unrelated research.
Employer responsibilities include:
- Creating a safe infant care space.
- Training staff.
- Ensuring compliance with child immunization requirements.
- Offering flexible schedules or remote work options for new parents.
Employers may allow employees to contribute up to 10% of their wages to support the program.
Annual reporting is required, including participation numbers, employee retention data, and program outcomes.
The Department of Family and Medical Leave will create safety standards and oversee funding distribution, prioritizing high-need workplaces.

Bottom line: This bill supports working parents by encouraging employers to create infant-friendly workplaces, helping ease the transition back to work after parental leave while promoting child development, parental bonding, and workforce retention.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Establishing Protections and Accountability for Delivery Network Company Workers, Consumers, and Communities

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1305) of Lydia Edwards, Michael D. Brady, Patricia D. Jehlen, John F. Keenan and others for legislation to establish protections and accountability for Delivery Network Company workers, consumers, and communities. Labor and Workforce Development.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Labor and Workforce Development)

Bill Summary:

This bill creates a new Infant-Friendly Workplace Program in Massachusetts to help eligible parents bring their infants (ages 6 weeks to 6 months) to work in a safe, supportive environment.

Key points:

Voluntary participation: Employers can choose to apply and be designated as an Infant-Friendly Workplace.
Eligible participants: Parents or legal guardians returning to work after Paid Family and Medical Leave for childbirth, adoption, or fostering.
State and federal funding: Grants and tax incentives available to support setup costs like infant-safe spaces and breastfeeding areas. Funds cannot be used for land, building construction, or unrelated research.
Employer requirements:
- Designate a safe, infant-appropriate workspace.
- Provide training and resources to staff.
- Follow immunization rules for participating infants.
- Allow flexible work schedules or remote days for new parents.
Employers may offer an optional 10% wage deduction from employees to help fund the program.
Annual reports must include participation rates, retention data, and any challenges or successes.
The Department of Family and Medical Leave will set program standards and oversee funding, prioritizing high-need workplaces.

Bottom line:This bill gives working parents more options by encouraging family-friendly workplaces that support early bonding, reduce childcare stress, and improve employee well-being and retention.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act to Protect the Collective Bargaining Rights of Certain Administrative Employees

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1306) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to protect the collective bargaining rights of certain management classification series employees.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Labor and Workforce Development)

Bill Summary:

This bill expands the definition of “employee” under public sector labor law to ensure more state workers are eligible for union representation.

Key points:

Clarifies eligibility: State employees in the Management Classification Series below level M-VI cannot be excluded from union coverage unless:
- The Department of Labor Relations determines their job is truly managerial, or
- There's an agreement with the relevant union excluding them.

Bottom line: This bill protects more public employees’ right to unionize, making sure they aren’t excluded from collective bargaining unless they meet strict criteria for managerial status.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Protecting Warehouse Workers

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1307) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to protect warehouse workers.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Labor and Workforce Development)

Bill Summary:

This bill regulates the use of work quotas at large warehouse distribution centers in Massachusetts and gives employees new rights to transparency, rest, and protection.

Key points:

Covers large warehouse employers:
- Applies to employers with 100+ employees at one warehouse or 500+ across multiple warehouses.
Defines “quota”:
- A work standard requiring employees to perform tasks at a set speed or volume.
- Includes quotas based on task completion vs. idle time.
Employee rights:
- Must be given a written description of each quota at hiring and whenever it changes.
- Quotas cannot prevent workers from taking meal, rest, or bathroom breaks.
- Employees may request copies of:
  - Their personal work speed data,
  - Aggregated speed data from peers,
  - And written quotas.
Recordkeeping required:
- Employers must maintain records of quotas and speed data for current and former employees and provide them on request at no cost.
Anti-retaliation protections:
- Employers cannot punish employees for:
  - Asking about quotas or data,
  - Filing a complaint,
  - Or asserting their rights under this law.
- Retaliation within 90 days of a protected activity triggers a rebuttable presumption of wrongdoing.
Enforcement:
- The Commissioner of Labor can investigate high-injury warehouses and assess civil penalties.
- The Attorney General can bring civil or criminal charges.
- Employees may sue for injunctive relief and damages, including triple actual damages or $10,000, whichever is higher.

Bottom line: This bill holds large warehouse employers accountable by regulating quotas and work speed tracking, ensuring workers can take required breaks, and protecting them from retaliation—while giving employees clear access to their performance data and the right to challenge unfair labor practices.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Securing the Application of Massachusetts Law to Employees of Employers Incorporated or Operating in Massachusetts who Provide their Labor and Services Remotely

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1308) of Lydia Edwards for legislation relative to the wage law and remote workforce.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Labor and Workforce Development)

Bill Summary:

This bill ensures that Massachusetts labor laws apply to remote employees who work virtually for companies incorporated, headquartered, or operating in Massachusetts—unless a contract clearly states otherwise and meets strict requirements.

Key points:

Covers remote workers: Applies to anyone classified as an employee under MA law who performs work virtually (e.g., by phone, internet, video) for a Massachusetts-based employer.
Applies to employers: Includes any public or private entity operating in Massachusetts—except the federal government and foreign governments.
Massachusetts law applies unless:
- A written contract clearly and unmistakably says another state’s law governs;
- That contract is mutually negotiated (not boilerplate);
- The employer fully complies with the laws of the chosen jurisdiction.
If the employer fails to comply with the other state’s employment laws, Massachusetts law still applies, regardless of the contract.

Bottom line: This bill protects remote employees by defaulting to Massachusetts employment laws for virtual workers doing business for MA companies—unless strict legal and contractual standards are met. It goes into effect January 1, 2026.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Allowing for Airline Catering to be Considered Covered Employees

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1309) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to establish forthwith a minimum wage for employees of airline catering companies.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Labor and Workforce Development)

Bill Summary:

This bill ensures that airline catering workers at Logan Airport are paid the same hourly wage as other airport service workers.

Key points:

Covers airline catering workers: Includes those who prepare, assemble, or deliver food, drinks, and supplies for flights at or near Logan Airport.
Wage parity: These workers must be paid equal to other airport service staff, like wheelchair assistants, skycaps, janitors, ticket agents, and baggage handlers.
Applies on and off airport grounds: Covers work done both on Logan Airport property and off-site if tied to a MassPort agreement or lease.

Implementation:

Any required wage increases must be implemented within 30 days of the law taking effect.

Bottom line: This bill promotes fair pay by requiring equal wages for airline catering staff doing essential airport work, ensuring they are compensated on par with other service workers at Logan.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Simplifying Inclusionary Zoning

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1441) of Lydia Edwards for legislation relative to inclusionary zones in affordable housing.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Municipalities and Regional Goverment)

Bill Summary:

This bill clarifies what’s allowed in local inclusionary zoning laws that require developers to include affordable housing in new projects.

Key points:

Sets an affordable housing limit: Cities and towns may adopt inclusionary zoning laws that require up to 13% of new units to be affordable.
Requires a density bonus: In exchange for including affordable units, developers must be allowed to build more total units (i.e., a density bonus).
Protects housing production: The zoning rules cannot unduly limit overall housing development in the area.
State oversight: The Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities may issue guidelines or regulations to ensure consistency.

Bottom line: This bill supports local efforts to expand affordable housing through inclusionary zoning—while ensuring that such policies don’t slow overall housing production and are backed by state guidance.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Authorizing Local Control of Waste Collection Hours of Operation

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1442) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to authorize local control of waste collection hours of operation.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Municipalities and Regional Goverment)

Bill Summary:

This bill gives local boards of health more control over when certain types of waste can be collected in residential and commercial areas.

Key points:

New local authority: Boards of health can restrict the hours when garbage, offal, or other offensive substances are collected.
Applies to specific zones: These restrictions apply to areas zoned for residential or commercial use.
Clarifies existing law: Removes outdated language and ensures the law reflects current zoning and public health needs.

Bottom line: This bill empowers local boards of health to reduce noise and disruptions by regulating waste collection times in neighborhoods and business districts.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Promoting Patient Safety and Equitable Access to Care

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1522) of Lydia Edwards, Adam Gomez, Susannah M. Whipps, James B. Eldridge and other members of the General Court for legislation to promote patient safety and equitable access to care

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Public Health)

Bill Summary:

This bill requires the Massachusetts Department of Public Health to establish safe nurse-to-patient limits in hospitals across the state, ensuring quality care and patient safety.

Key Provisions:

Statewide Patient Limits:
The Department of Public Health (in coordination with the Department of Mental Health) will set maximum limits on how many patients a registered nurse can care for at one time—varying by hospital unit (e.g. ER, maternity, surgical, psychiatric, pediatric, etc.).
Flexible Staffing Based on Patient Needs:
No minimum nurse assignment is required. Staffing should reflect patient condition, care complexity, and available support.
Public Input Required:
The Department must hold public hearings before finalizing rules.
Enforcement Measures:
The Attorney General may enforce violations through civil penalties (up to $25,000 per violation) and other legal remedies.
Whistleblower Protections:
Nurses cannot be punished for following these limits. Retaliation will trigger legal protections and remedies.
Emergency Suspension:
Limits may be temporarily lifted during a state or national public health emergency.
Timeline:
The Department of Public Health must adopt these regulations within 24 months of the law’s passage.

Bottom Line: This bill ensures safe nurse staffing in hospitals by establishing enforceable patient limits, with input from the public and protections for nurses who speak up.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Establishing a Peace Officer Oath

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1680) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to establish an ethic oath for peace officers.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security)

Bill Summary:

This bill requires all certified peace officers in Massachusetts to take an ethical oath emphasizing public service, accountability, and constitutional rights.

Key Provisions:

Who it applies to:
All certified peace officers, including special state police, deputy sheriffs, constables, and other law enforcement agents, must take the oath upon certification and recertification.
Oath principles include pledges to:
- Do no harm and prioritize public well-being.
- Use force only when necessary, with emphasis on de-escalation.
- Protect civil rights without discrimination.
- Ensure medical aid is provided or called for when needed.
- Serve with transparency and integrity.
- Continue professional education, especially in ethics.
- Report misconduct to foster accountability.
Implementation & Oversight:
- The POST Commission (Peace Officer Standards and Training) will develop the final oath language.
- The oath will be part of training, evaluations, and certification.
- Failure to comply may lead to disciplinary review.
- The POST Commission and Executive Office of Public Safety will report annually on the oath’s impact.

Effective Date: 90 days after passage to allow time for development and implementation.

Bottom Line: This bill strengthens ethics and accountability in law enforcement by requiring officers to take a formal oath grounded in public trust, civil rights, and professional conduct.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Relating to Improvements to Residential Properties

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1969) of Lydia Edwards relative to the financing of qualifying improvements to residential property.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Revenue)

Bill Summary:

This bill establishes a required ethical oath for all certified peace officers in Massachusetts, reinforcing values of public trust, ethical conduct, and civil rights protections.

Key Points:

Who must take the oath:
All certified peace officers, including special state police, deputy sheriffs, constables, and reserve or intermittent officers.
When:
The oath is administered at certification and recertification.
What the oath includes:
- A pledge to “do no harm” and prioritize community well-being.
- A commitment to use force only when absolutely necessary.
- A promise to uphold civil rights without discrimination.
- An obligation to provide or seek emergency medical aid as needed.
- A vow to act with transparency, integrity, and accountability.
- A dedication to continued ethical and professional training.
- A duty to report and address misconduct.
Oversight:
- The POST Commission will draft and administer the oath.
- The oath will be integrated into training, evaluation, and certification.
- Noncompliance may trigger disciplinary review.
- Annual reports will track the oath’s impact on standards and trust.

Bottom Line: This bill promotes ethical policing and public accountability by requiring peace officers to take a formal oath focused on community safety, civil rights, and professional responsibility.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Providing Renter Relief Tax Credit

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1970) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to provide an increase in the renter relief tax credit.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Revenue)

Bill Summary:

This bill expands tax relief for renters and raises the maximum deduction for rent payments in Massachusetts.

Key points:

Increases rent deduction: Raises the allowable rent deduction from $3,000 to $9,000 on state income taxes.
New renter tax credit:
- Available to residents earning $75,000 or less in adjusted gross income.
- Offers a refundable credit equal to 15% of half the rent paid above $12,000 annually.
- Credit is capped at $3,000 per taxpayer (single, married, or head of household).

Bottom line: This bill helps low- and moderate-income renters by significantly increasing the rent deduction and creating a new refundable tax credit to ease housing costs.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Creating a Graduated Deed Excise Tax for Affordable Housing

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1971) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to create a graduated deed excise tax for affordable housing.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Revenue)

Bill Summary:

This bill increases the deed transfer tax on high-value property sales in Massachusetts and directs the new revenue toward affordable housing.

Key Points:

Graduated tax rate:
- For property sales:
  - $250K–$500K: 1.1× the current tax rate
  - $500K–$1M: 1.6× the current tax rate
  - $1M–$2M: 1.8× the current tax rate
  - Over $2M: 2× the current tax rate
The existing tax rate of $2 per $500 remains the base.
Revenue use: All new revenue collected from the increased deed transfer tax will be split equally between:
- Programs that address the housing crisis
- Initiatives under the Affordable Housing Act (Chapter 150 of the Acts of 2024)

Bottom line: The bill aims to make the state’s real estate transaction tax more progressive, raising more funds from high-end property sales to invest directly in affordable housing solutions.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Relative to the Electrification of New and Substantially Remodeled or Rehabilitated Building

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2266) of Lydia Edwards for legislation relative to the electrification of new and substantially remodeled or rehabilitated building.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy)

Bill Summary:

This bill requires new and significantly renovated large buildings in Massachusetts—including hospitals, labs, and residential buildings—to transition away from fossil fuels and reduce greenhouse gas emissions over time.

Key Points:

All new and substantially renovated buildings must use electricity (or solar thermal) instead of fossil fuels for:
- Heating & cooling
- Cooking
- Clothes drying
- Hot water systems (with some exceptions)
Biolabs and hospitals face stricter emissions standards:
- Must achieve net-zero emissions by 2050
- Hospitals must hit specific emissions reduction targets every 5 years starting in 2025
Waivers may be granted if compliance is impractical, but only with justification and a plan to limit emissions
Exemptions include:
- Freestanding gas appliances not connected to the building’s infrastructure
- Backup generators
- Large hot water systems where no cost-effective electric option exists
Municipalities can pass their own additional emissions rules for existing buildings and impose penalties for violations
Gas utilities must submit a just transition plan for workers, particularly in environmental justice communities

Bottom line: This bill sets the stage for a fossil-free future in large building construction across Massachusetts, with special targets for hospitals and labs—while ensuring communities and workers are supported during the clean energy transition.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

An Act Modernizing the Governance of Port Authority Parks in East Boston

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 584) of Lydia Edwards for legislation to modernize the governance of Port Authority parks in East Boston. Environment and Natural Resources.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Joint Committee on Environment and Natural Resources)

Bill Summary:

This bill modernizes Chapter 349 of the Acts of 1986 to expand and guide the development of public parks on the East Boston waterfront—including the creation of Piers Park Phases II and III—while strengthening community oversight and accountability.

Key Points:

Updates definitions in the original law to clarify that Piers Park includes Phase I (existing), Phase II (planned on uplands), and Phase III (on Pier 3)
- Adds other East Boston parks like Bremen Street Park, Al Festa Field, and the Narrow Gauge Extension
Massport is authorized to:
- Design, construct, maintain, and operate all parks
- Enter agreements with the Project Advisory Committee (PAC)
- Lease Phase III to a nonprofit for 99 years for park development
- Receive and use public and private funds for park projects
Construction and labor rules:
- Most park construction is treated as public works and subject to prevailing wage laws
- If Phase III is leased long-term to a nonprofit, some construction rules don’t apply—but prevailing wages still do
The PAC is restructured:
- Now includes 21 East Boston residents, appointed equally by the local state rep, senator, and city councilor
- Members serve staggered 3-year terms and must reflect the neighborhood’s diversity
- PAC must approve all park designs before construction begins
- PAC and Massport must maintain a binding operations contract, with penalties for noncompliance
Phase II construction must begin immediately
- Massport is required to move quickly on Phase II
- Phase III construction can’t begin until bonds are issued by the state and funding is secured
Funding responsibilities:
- Massport must fund Phases I and II
- Phase III is contingent on state-issued bonds
- Massport pays for ongoing staffing, maintenance, and security
- Any fees or revenue from the parks must be reinvested into park upkeep
All previous PAC structures are dissolved
- New appointments must follow the updated rules in the bill

Bottom line: This bill ensures a clear, community-led path forward for expanding and protecting waterfront parks in East Boston—holding Massport accountable, empowering local residents, and guaranteeing public access to green space for generations to come.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

Resolve Relative to Pharmacy Deserts

By Ms. Edwards, a petition (accompanied by resolve, Senate, No. 858) of Lydia Edwards that provisions to assess the supply, distribution and capacity of pharmacy and pharmacological services.

CURRENT STATUS: Committee Assignment and Hearing (Committee on Ways and Means)

Bill Summary:

This bill directs the state’s Office of Health Resource Planning to conduct a comprehensive assessment of pharmacy deserts in Massachusetts—areas where residents face limited or no access to pharmacies—and report on their impacts and potential solutions.

Key Points:

The assessment must examine:
- The supply, distribution, and capacity of pharmacy and pharmacological services statewide
- The number and location of pharmacy deserts, defined as areas with:
  - No nearby pharmacy (more than:
    - 1 mile in urban areas
    - 5 miles in suburban areas
    - 10 miles in rural areas)
  - Travel times longer than 15 minutes by car or 30 minutes by public transit
  - Limited access to transportation, public or private
The Office must also analyze how pharmacy deserts affect:
- Medication access and health outcomes
- Impacted neighborhoods and patient populations
- Geographic and financial barriers to filling prescriptions
- Transportation challenges
- Emergency department visits and hospitalizations
- The role of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) in pharmacy closures
Due date:
A full report must be submitted by September 1, 2026 to the Health Policy Commission and several legislative and public health entities.
The report must include:
- Detailed findings and data analysis
- Policy recommendations to eliminate existing pharmacy deserts and prevent new ones

Bottom line: This bill seeks to shine a light on pharmacy access disparities across Massachusetts—especially in underserved areas—and develop data-driven policies to ensure all residents can get the medications they need, regardless of where they live.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE BILL

CURRENT LEGISLATION

An Act to Facilitate Labor Peace Among the Cannabis Workforce

​